Figure 9: ST and LT comparison with two replacements
for the bus not reaching the vehicle EOL point, a second
BT replacement has been considered.
Fig. 8 shows the operation costs obtained on each
evaluation point for each EMS, the ST, and the LT. The
ST EMS shows lower operation costs than LT EMS,
reaching values up to 2.5%.
By contrast, as shown in Fig. 9, if the vehicle requires
two BT replacements, the opposite happens. A decrease
up to 4.8% in the LT EMS is obtained in the operation
costs.
VI. C
ONCLUSIONS
In this paper, a BT aging conscious intelligent energy
management strategy was presented focused on BT life-
time maximization. For the validation of the proposed
BT conscious EMS and EMS update methodology, a
simulation as described in Section II is carried out.
The obtained results against a non-adaptive EMS has
been up to 47% of operation costs decrease. For the
stability evaluation, the worst and best cases have been
evaluated, obtaining an increase of the operation costs
up to 5.1% and a decrease up to 21.2% respectively.
The BT aging extension has been of 2.94%, compared
to the non-updated EMS, reaching the planned bus
EOL. However, in the case of the non-updated EMS,
the scheduled EOL date is not reached. In this regard,
the two analyzed possibilities are to remove the bus
before the planned time or to replace the BT. In the
case of removing the bus, the obtained results for the
ST operating cost have a decrease up to 2.5%. On the
contrary, considering to replace the BT, the operation
costs of the LT EMS decrease up to a 4.8%, since the
BT lifetime overcomes the planned EOL date and an
only BT replacement is needed. It is worth to highlight
that the penalization for not reaching the bus EOL was
not taken into account for the scenario of removing the
bus.
On the ongoing research, an improved and self-
adaptive [14] BT aging estimation model will be im-
plemented to the BT aging conscious EMS.
A
CKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was partially supported by the Gipuzkoa
Provincial Council under Project On-Mobility (Regional
Program Red Guipuzcoana de Ciencia, Technology and
Innovation).
R
EFERENCES
[1] The latest bull case for electric cars: the cheapest batteries ever.
Available:https://www.bloomberg.com/news /articles/2017-12-
05/latest-bull-case-forelectric- cars-the-cheapest-batteries-ever,
05-12-2017 [Accessed: 26-04-2018].
[2] Z. Bi, L. Song, R. De Kleine, C. C. Mi, and G. A.
Keoleian, “Plug-in vs. wireless charging: Life cycle energy and
greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system,” Applied
Energy, vol. 146, no. February, pp. 11–19, 2015. [Online].
Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.031
[3] R. Dufo-L
´
opez, “Optimisation of size and control of grid-
connected storage under real time electricity pricing condi-
tions,” Applied Energy, vol. 140, pp. 395 – 408, 2015.
[4] J. Du, X. Zhang, T. Wang, Z. Song, X. Yang,
H. Wang, M. Ouyang, and X. Wu, “Battery degradation
minimization oriented energy management strategy for plug-
in hybrid electric bus with multi-energy storage system,”
Energy, vol. 165, pp. 153–163, 2018. [Online]. Available:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.084
[5] L. Tang, G. Rizzoni, and S. Onori, “Energy management
strategy for HEVs including battery life optimization,” IEEE
Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 1, no. 3,
pp. 211–222, 2015.
[6] L. Tang and G. Rizzoni, “Energy management strategy in-
cluding battery life optimization for a HEV with a CVT,”
2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo,
Asia-Pacific, ITEC Asia-Pacific 2016, pp. 549–554, 2016.
[7] V. I. Herrera, A. Milo, H. Gazta
˜
naga, J. Ramos, and H. Camb-
long, “Adaptive and non-adaptive strategies for optimal energy
management and sizing of a dual storage system in a hybrid
electric bus,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation
Systems, pp. 1–13, 2018.